It is the cache of ${baseHref}. It is a snapshot of the page. The current page could have changed in the meantime.
Tip: To quickly find your search term on this page, press Ctrl+F or ⌘-F (Mac) and use the find bar.

Comparison of Elastic Modulus and Compressive Strength of Ariadent and Harvard Polycarboxylate Cement and Vitremer Resin Modified Glass Ionomer - Zahedan Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
   [Home ]     [ فارسي ]  
Zahedan Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
:: Main Online Submission Archive Current Issue In Press ::
:: Volume 11, Number 3 (Autumn 2009) ::
Back to browse issues page 3 2009, 11(3): 0-0
XML Comparison of Elastic Modulus and Compressive Strength of Ariadent and Harvard Polycarboxylate Cement and Vitremer Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Print

Persian Abstract
Author(s): Leila Ahmadian Khoshemehr, Rasoul Arbabi Kalati , Parvin Arbabi Kalati
Study Type: Research | Subject: Dentistry
Article abstract:
Background: Luting agents are used to attach indirect restoration into or on the tooth. Poor mechanical properties of cement may be a cause of fracture of this layer and lead to caries and restoration removal. The purpose of this study was to compare the elastic modulus and compressive strength of Ariadent (A Poly) and Harvard polycarboxylate (H Poly) cements and Vitremer resin modified glass ionomer (RGl). Materials & Methods: In this experimental study 15 specimens were prepared form each experimental cement in Laboratory of Tehran Oil Refining Company. The cylindrical specimens were compressed in Instron machine after 24 hours. Elastic modulus and compressive strength were calculated from stress/strain curve of each specimen. One way ANOVA and Tukey tests were used for statistical analysis and P values<0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. Results: The mean elastic modulus and mean compressive strength were 2.2 GPa and 87.8MPa in H poly, 2.4 GPa and 56.5 MPa in A Poly, and 0.8GPa and 105.6 MPa in RGI, respectively. Statistical analysis showed that compressive strength and elastic modulus of both polycarboxylate cements were significantly different from hybrid ionomer (P<0.05), but the difference between elastic modulus of two types of polycarboxilate cements was not statistically significant. Compressive strength of two polycarboxilate cements were significantly different (P<0.05). Conclusion: An ideal lutting agent must have the best mechanical properties. Between the tested luttins RGl cement had the lowest elastic modulus and the highest compressive strength, but the A poly cement had the highest elastic modulus and the lowest compressive strength. Therefore none of them was the best.
KeywordsLutting agent, compressive strength, elastic modulus,
Full text [PDF 294 kb]
How to cite this article
Download citation data for: BibTeX | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks |  
Send citation data to: CiteULike | RefWorks |
Ahmadian Khoshemehr L, Arbabi Kalati R, Arbabi Kalati P. Comparison of Elastic Modulus and Compressive Strength of Ariadent and Harvard Polycarboxylate Cement and Vitremer Resin Modified Glass Ionomer. 3. 2009; 11 (3) :0-0
URL http://www.zjrms.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-22-1&slc_lang=en&sid=1
Add your comments about this article
Your username or email:

Write the security code in the box >
 
Back to browse issues page Volume 11, Number 3 ( Autumn 2009)
Zahedan Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Static site map - Persian site map - English site map - Created in 1.003 seconds with 645 queries by AWT YEKTAWEB 2.3.8.0