Introduction
Self-rated health corresponds to one's perception of personal health status in the social, cultural, and historical context. 1 It is a valid, reliable, and cost-effective indicator of perceptions of general and oral health. 2 Several studies have identified factors associated with self-rated oral health in the elderly, including self-esteem, life satisfaction, income, dental attendance, sex, perception of treatment need, dental pain, untreated caries, and prosthetic status and need. 3-6
In 2003, a pioneering study in Brazil used self-rated questions to evaluate subjects' perceptions of oral health, chewing, speech, social networking, and appearance. 7 Using data from this survey, 3 studies investigated the factors associated with self-rated oral health in the elderly population and found that self-rated oral appearance was the variable most strongly associated with self-rated oral health. 3-5 Another study evaluated the factors associated with poor self-perception of mastication. 8
Elderly Brazilians were reported to have poor oral health, with a high prevalence of edentulism and need for dental prosthetics. 7 In 2003, approximately 50% of the elderly population required 1 or 2 complete prostheses. Tooth loss and the need for prostheses were associated with poor self-rated oral health and mastication. 3-5,8 However, to our knowledge, no studies have evaluated factors associated with self-rated oral appearance among the elderly.
Meng et al. 9 assessed the satisfaction with dental appearance in adults, adopting a multidimensional conceptual model of oral health. Their results demonstrated that satisfaction with appearance was associated with sociodemographic characteristics, approach to dental care, oral disease, and oral disadvantage.
Among the elderly, aesthetic rather than functional factors dictate a patient's subjective need to replace missing teeth. 10 Self-rated oral appearance has also gained increasing interest among researchers and dental clinicians because patients and dentists often evaluate dental aesthetics differently. 11 Considering the large numbers of teeth lost among Brazilian elderly 7 and the possibility of rehabilitation with a dental prosthesis, we investigated the association between poor self-rated oral appearance and the need for a dental prosthesis in the elderly Brazilian population.
Methodology
This cross-sectional study used the database of the epidemiological survey on oral health in Brazil conducted from 2002 to 2003 by the Ministry of Health. In total, 108,921 individuals participated in the survey. A multistage cluster sampling design consisted of a random selection of 250 towns from all the Brazilian states, stratified by Brazilian macroregions (North, Northeast, Midwest, Southeast, and South) and population size (< 5000 inhabitants, 5001–10,000, 10,001–50,000, 50,001–100,000, and > 100,001). The sampling was designed to obtain a representative sample of the Brazilian regions, towns, and age groups. A probabilistic sample selection method was adopted. We selectively analyzed the data of individuals aged 65 to 74 years, the age range recommended by the World Health Organization for assessing the oral health status of the elderly. 12 The data were collected by oral examinations and structured interviews conducted in-home by trained dental surgeons. The oral examinations were performed under natural illumination using flat mirrors, periodontal probes, and wooden spatulas.
The dependent variable was self-rated oral appearance (SROA), assessed by the question, “How would you classify the appearance of your teeth and gums?” The response options were “good” (fair∕good∕very good) or “poor” (very poor∕poor). The main independent variable was the need for an upper and∕or lower prosthesis; this variable was categorized on the basis of the results of oral examinations as follows:
0, does not need a dental prosthesis;
1, needs a fixed or removable prosthesis to replace 1 element;
2, needs a fixed or removable prosthesis to replace more than 1 element;
3, needs a combination of fixed and∕or removable prosthesis to replace 1 or more elements; and
4, needs a complete prosthesis.
The other independent variables were combined into 4 subgroups according to the theoretical model proposed by Meng et al. 9 (Figure 1).
Sociodemographic characteristics:
information on Brazilian macroregion,
place of residence,
age,
sex,
self-declared skin color,
years of education, and
per capita income in reals (US$1.0 = R$3.20).
Approach to dental care:
type of dental service used,
access to information about oral disease prevention, and
time since the last dental visit.
Oral conditions:
numbers of present and decayed teeth and
perceived and actual needs for dental treatment. The need for dental treatment was evaluated according to the following criteria: 12
0, no need;
1, restoration of 1,
2, or more surfaces;
3, crown placement for any reason;
4, veneer placement;
5, pulp treatment and restoration;
6, extraction;
7, remineralization of white spot; and
8, sealant treatment.
The subjects with codes 1 to 8 were categorized as requiring dental treatment.
Self-reported oral disadvantages:
Dental and gingival pain within the last 6 months was categorized as
Chewing ability (good or poor) and damage to relationships with other people because of tooth or gum conditions were also considered.
The survey was approved by CONEP (Process no. 581∕2000). Bivariate and multivariate analyses were conducted using a Poisson regression model to produce direct estimates of all prevalence ratios (PR; 95% CI) and the chi-square test for statistical significance. Variables with p < 0.25 in the bivariate analysis were included in the multivariate analysis in decreasing order of significance. In the final adjusted model, only the variables significantly associated with SROA with p < 0.05, were used. All of the analyses were performed using the Predictive Analytics Software version 18.0 for Windows (IBM Corporation, Armonk, USA).
Results
A total of 5,349 people were interviewed and examined; of these subjects, 510 individuals did not report their SROA and were thus excluded from the analysis. The prevalence rates of poor and good SROA were 20.6% and 89.4%, respectively. Upper and lower prostheses were required in 31.3% and 55.7% of the patients, respectively (Table 1).
Need for a dental prosthesis | Upper (%) (n = 4830) | Lower (%) (n = 4826) |
---|---|---|
Does not need | 68.7 | 44.3 |
Fixed or removable partial prosthesis (RPP) to replace 1 element | 1.3 | 1.6 |
Fixed or RPP to replace more than 1 element | 6.3 | 13.6 |
Combination of fixed and∕or RPP to replace 1 or more elements | 9.2 | 18.3 |
Complete prosthesis | 14.5 | 22.3 |
In the bivariate analysis, all independent variables were associated with poor SROA at p < 0.25 with the exception of the residence location (Table 2).
Total n | Prevalence of poor self-rated oral appearance | PR | | ||
n | % | ||||
Sociodemographic characteristics | |||||
Brazilian macroregion | |||||
• Southeast | 958 | 144 | 15.0 | 1 | |
• South | 1307 | 183 | 14.0 | 0.93 (0.76–1.14) | 0.491 |
• Midwest | 648 | 133 | 20.5 | 1.37 (1.10–1.69) | 0.004 |
• Northeast | 1256 | 345 | 27.5 | 1.83 (1.53–2.18) | 0.000 |
• North | 670 | 193 | 28.8 | 1.92 (1.58–2.32) | 0.000 |
Residence location | |||||
• Urban area | 4222 | 873 | 20.7 | 1 | |
• Rural area | 615 | 123 | 20.0 | 0.97 (0.82–1.15) | 0.699 |
Age range, years | |||||
• 65–69 | 2929 | 644 | 22.0 | 1 | |
• 70–74 | 1910 | 354 | 18.5 | 0.84 (0.75–0.95) | 0.004 |
Sex | |||||
• Female | 2945 | 565 | 19.2 | 1 | |
• Male | 1894 | 433 | 22.9 | 1.19 (1.07–1.33) | 0.002 |
Self-declared skin color | |||||
• White | 2366 | 380 | 16.1 | 1 | |
• Nonwhite | 2457 | 616 | 25.1 | 1.56 (1.39–1.75) | < 0.001 |
Years of education | |||||
• ≥ 5 | 968 | 163 | 16.8 | 1 | |
• 1–4 | 2203 | 434 | 19.7 | 1.17(0.99–1.38) | 0.060 |
• 0 | 1668 | 401 | 24.0 | 1.43 (1.21–1.68) | < 0.001 |
Per capita income in reais | |||||
• ≥ 201.00 | 1441 | 211 | 14.6 | 1 | |
• 100.00 to 200.00 | 1906 | 370 | 19.4 | 1.33 (1.14–1.55) | < 0.001 |
• 0 to 99.00 | 1461 | 409 | 28.0 | 1.91 (1.65–2.22) | < 0.001 |
Approach to dental care | |||||
Type of dental service used | |||||
• Private | 2414 | 368 | 15.2 | 1 | |
• Public | 2026 | 474 | 23.4 | 1.54 (1.36–1.74) | < 0.001 |
• Never used | 188 | 90 | 47.9 | 3.14 (2.63–3.75) | < 0.001 |
Access to information about oral disease prevention | |||||
• Yes | 1983 | 323 | 16.3 | 1 | |
• No | 2853 | 675 | 23.7 | 1.45 (1.29–1.64) | < 0.001 |
Time since the last dental visit | |||||
• ≤ 2 years | 1442 | 257 | 17.8 | 1 | |
• ≥ 3 years | 3195 | 647 | 20.3 | 1.14 (0.99–1.30) | 0.055 |
• Never | 188 | 90 | 47.4 | 2.69 (2.23–3.24) | <0.001 |
Oral health conditions | |||||
• Number of permanent teeth present | 1.02 (1.01–1.02) | < 0.001 | |||
• Number of decayed permanent teeth | 1.09 (1.08–1.10) | < 0.001 | |||
Need for dental treatment | |||||
• No | 3286 | 485 | 14.8 | 1 | |
• Yes | 1553 | 513 | 33.0 | 2.24 (2.01–2.49) | < 0.001 |
Need for an upper prosthesis | |||||
• Does not need | 3320 | 449 | 13.6 | 1 | |
• Needs a fixed or RPP | 809 | 285 | 35.2 | 2.61 (2.29–2.96) | < 0.001 |
• Needs a complete prosthesis | 701 | 261 | 37.2 | 2.75 (2.42–3.13) | < 0.001 |
Need for a lower prosthesis | |||||
• Does not need | 2137 | 237 | 11.1 | 1 | |
• Needs a fixed or RPP | 1615 | 461 | 28.5 | 2.56 (2.32–2.97) | < 0.001 |
• Needs a complete prosthesis | 1074 | 295 | 27.5 | 2.48 (2.12–2.89) | < 0.001 |
Self-perception of the need for dental treatment | |||||
• No | 2161 | 210 | 9.7 | 1 | |
• Yes | 2669 | 788 | 29.5 | 3.04 (2.64–3.50) | < 0.001 |
Self-reported oral disadvantage | |||||
Dental and gingival pain within the last 6 months | |||||
• Absent | 3700 | 619 | 16.7 | 1 | |
• Present | 1138 | 378 | 33.2 | 1.99 (1.78–2.22) | < 0.001 |
Chewing ability | |||||
• Good | 3643 | 350 | 9.6 | 1 | |
• Poor | 1170 | 641 | 54.8 | 5.70 (5.10–6.38) | < 0.001 |
Oral health affects relationships with other people | |||||
• No | 3163 | 401 | 12.7 | 1 | |
• Yes | 1240 | 477 | 38.5 | 3.03 (2.70–3.40) | < 0.001 |
The reference category of the dependent variable was good SROA.
**Mean (standard deviation) of the quantitative variables. Permanent teeth present: total sample, 5.75 (8.05); poor, 6.95 (7.78); and good, 5.43 (8.10). Decayed permanent teeth: total sample, 1.28 (2.98); poor, 2.60 (4.36); and good, 0.93 (2.39).
In the final model, the prevalence of poor SROA, independent of other variables, was higher among those who needed a partial or complete upper or lower prosthesis and among those who never used dental services, visited a dentist more than 3 years ago, did not have access to information about oral problem prevention, had more decayed teeth, self-rated the need for dental treatment, reported dental and gingival pain within the last 6 years, showed poor chewing ability, or affirmed that their oral health affected their relationships with other people. The prevalence of poor SROA was lowest among those aged 70–74 years. Two main associations were observed with the 2 variables reflecting the perception of health, i.e., poor chewing ability and self-perception of the need for dental treatment (Table 3).
Adjusted PR (95% CI) | | |
Age range | ||
65–69 | 1 | |
70–74 | 0.87 (0.78–0.98) | 0.021 |
Type of dental service | ||
Private | 1 | |
Public | 1.14 (1.02–1.29) | 0.025 |
Never used | 1.58 (1.26–1.98) | < 0.001 |
Access to information about oral problem prevention | ||
Yes | 1 | |
No | 1.14 (1.01–1.28) | 0.034 |
Time since the last dental visit | ||
≤ 2 years | 1 | |
≥ 3 years | 1.20 (1.06–1.36) | 0.003 |
Need for upper prosthesis | ||
Does not need | 1 | |
Needs a fixed or RPP | 1.33 (1.13–1.56) | 0.001 |
Needs a complete prosthesis | 1.18 (1.01–1.39) | 0.042 |
Need for lower prosthesis | ||
Does not need | 1 | |
Needs a fixed or RPP | 1.21 (1.01–1.45) | 0.042 |
Needs a complete prosthesis | 1.25 (1.04–1.50) | 0.019 |
Number of decayed teeth | 1.10 (1.01–1.20) | 0.022 |
Self-perception of the need for dental treatment | ||
No | 1 | |
Yes | 1.70 (1.46–1.98) | < 0.001 |
Dental and gingival pain within the last 6 months | ||
Absent | 1 | |
Present | 1.22 (1.08–1.37) | < 0.001 |
Chewing ability | ||
Good | 1 | |
Poor | 3.02 (2.57–3.54) | < 0.001 |
Oral health affects relationships with other people | ||
No | 1 | |
Yes | 1.37 (1.21–1.55) | < 0.001 |
Discussion
The prevalence of poor SROA, represented by a mean of 26.03 missing teeth, was low despite the overall poor oral health conditions of subjects. Elderly Germans also self-reported high satisfaction with their oral appearance 13 but had a lower median number of lost (14.2) and decayed (0.5) teeth than the Brazilian elderly. 14 In the United Kingdom, 80.3% of the population aged ≥ 55 years were satisfied with their teeth color; 15 however, aesthetics were addressed with preconceived standards of what is beautiful and acceptable. The low prevalence of poor SROA may be explained by the fact that 81.4% of the edentate elderly used an upper prosthesis and 62.8% used a lower prosthesis. 8 In a previous study, the importance of dental prostheses for enhancing appearance was observed because the elderly used these devices to create a satisfactory appearance even when they did not fit well. 16
The present study confirmed the theoretical model of Meng et al. 9 , as variables in all of the groups showed a significant association with SROA. The need for dental prostheses was associated with SROA, independent of other variables. Dental prostheses can restore oral appearance to an acceptable state 17 and minimize the adverse effects of tooth loss by improving self-esteem and interpersonal relationships 18 because the elderly associate good appearance with the ability to communicate and make social connections. 19 Furthermore, aesthetics are the main reasons for the use of prostheses among participants. 20 Thus, concerns about replacing lost teeth are greater when aesthetics are involved, 11 necessitating the consideration of the psychological and social aspects of dental loss during prosthetic rehabilitation for the elderly.
The number of decayed teeth and the self-perception of the need for dental treatment were also associated with SROA. Dissatisfaction with the appearance of teeth was previously associated with self-related anterior decayed, 21 stained, or broken teeth, 9 which may compromise self-perception of appearance and damage self-esteem. The significant and strong association between poor SROA and self-perception of the need for dental treatment was expected, as elderly people who perceive a need for dental treatment are likely to have other negative psychosocial effects of oral health conditions.
Age was the only sociodemographic variable associated with poor SROA, and SROA was lower among the subjects in the oldest age group. This finding may be attributed to the argument that younger people actively try to improve their physical appearance to obtain a better job and gain greater social acceptance. 15 Older people, on the other hand, may more easily incorporate poorer dental appearance in their self-image and may have a low desire to make changes. 15
The 3 variables related to dental services were associated with SROA. Elderly adults who had never used dental services or used them infrequently were more likely to have a poor SROA. These variables were associated with poor self-rated oral health among elderly Brazilians. 4-6 Irregular or infrequent users of dental services had more carious teeth than regular users 22 and lost more teeth than regular users. 23 Thus, routine visits can help preserve functional dentition, thereby improving the perception of appearance. Moreover, dental visits might reassure and inform people, boosting their confidence regarding their oral health condition, rendering them more likely to report the positive aspects of their oral health. 24 Elderly people who used public dental services showed a higher prevalence of poor SROA. In Brazil, historically, this group did not receive public dental care service, except in cases of urgency, resulting in dental mutilation. Moreover, for many years, prosthetic treatment under public health services was not offered to the elderly population, thus worsening their oral health status.
The higher prevalence of poor SROA among those who felt that oral health affected interpersonal relationships highlights its importance in social interactions. Poor SROA was also greater among those who had experienced pain in the last 6 months or among those who were unsatisfied with their chewing ability. These individuals likely experienced a common oral health condition involving a lack of teeth or the presence of teeth in a precarious state, which had a negative impact on various aspects of oral health.
The advantages of our analysis are the large sample size and high response rate. The main methodological consideration involved sample selection using the cluster sampling technique. Although sample weights were not calculated, this procedure would not affect the magnitudes or direction of the identified associations. 25 The results of this study support the present oral health policy in Brazil, which aims to provide dental prostheses to all the elderly as part of the Brazilian public dentistry health service. Improvements in the quality of preventative information, access to dental services, treatment of decayed teeth, and rehabilitation with dental prosthesis may contribute to greater satisfaction with appearance, especially among those elderly who experience dental and gingival pain, those who perceive a need for dental treatment, and those with impaired chewing ability.