It is the cache of ${baseHref}. It is a snapshot of the page. The current page could have changed in the meantime.
Tip: To quickly find your search term on this page, press Ctrl+F or ⌘-F (Mac) and use the find bar.

Proactive Location Service in Mobility Management | Liu | Journal of Networks
Journal of Networks, Vol 6, No 4 (2011), 670-677, Apr 2011
doi:10.4304/jnw.6.4.670-677

Proactive Location Service in Mobility Management

Yu Liu, Qiang Shen, Zhijun Zhao, Hui Tang

Abstract


This paper proposes a new proactive mobility management mechanism.  Instead of traditional mobility management system that when a user wants to connect another it needs to lookup the current location of the called user from the remote home location register (HLR) of the called user, the proposed method provides a special proactive location service to the close friends, who satisfy certain characteristics, of a user. The proactive location service pushes the location information of a user to the current locations of its close friends and is cached there. By doing so, the location lookup of its close friends in calling process is localized resulting in lower lookup delay and signaling cost. The distinct relations between different user pairs are explored, which can be used to identify the close friend group from other friends of a user. The close relation is defined as a function of parameters of calling and mobility characteristics. These parameters are estimated adaptively which are used to update the close relation friends. System performance evaluation and analysis demonstrate that the proposed proactive mobility management mechanism can reduce location lookup delay and signaling cost significantly compared with the traditional mobility management scheme.


Keywords


mobility management;proactive location service; push-and-cache;relation mining

References


[1] I. F. Akyildiz et al., “Mobility Management in Next-Generation Wireless Systems,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 87, no. 8, Aug. 1999, pp. 1347-84.
doi:10.1109/5.775420

[2] A. Bar-Noy, I. Kessler, and M. Sidi,“Mobile users: To update or not to update?” ACM-Baltzer J. Wireless Networks, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 175-186, July 1995.
doi:10.1007/BF01202540

[3] Y. Fang, “Movement-based location management and tradeoff analysis for wireless mobile networks,” IEEE Trans. Comput., vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 791-803, Jun. 2003.
doi:10.1109/TC.2003.1204834

[4] Vincent. W.S. Wong and Victor. C.M. Leung, “Location Management for Next Generation Personal Communication Networks,” IEEE Network, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 8-14, September/October 2000.

[5] I.F. Akyildiz, J. Xie, and S. Mohanty, A Survey on Mobility Management in Next Generation All-IP Based Wireless Systems, IEEE Wireless Comm., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 16-28, Aug. 2004.
doi:10.1109/MWC.2004.1325888

[6] J. Xie and I. F. Akyildiz, “A distributed dynamic regional location management scheme for mobile IP,” in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2002, pp. 1069-1078.

[7] Wenchao. Ma and Yuguang. Fang, “Dynamic Hierarchical Mobility Management Strategy for Mobile IP Networks”, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications (JSAC), vol. 22, no. 4, May 2004, pp. 664-676.

[8] Christian. Makaya and Samuel. Pierre, “An Analytical Framework for Performance Evaluation of IPv6-Based Mobility Management Protocols”, IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 7, no. 3, Mar. 2008, pp. 972-983.

[9] R. Koch, (2001). The 80/20 Principle: The Secret of Achieving More with Less. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.

[10] J. Wolberg, Data Analysis Using the Method of Least Squares: Extracting the Most Information from Experiments, Springer, 2005.


Full Text: PDF


Journal of Networks (JNW, ISSN 1796-2056)

Copyright @ 2006-2014 by ACADEMY PUBLISHER – All rights reserved.