It is the cache of ${baseHref}. It is a snapshot of the page. The current page could have changed in the meantime.
Tip: To quickly find your search term on this page, press Ctrl+F or ⌘-F (Mac) and use the find bar.

Triple combination therapy with amlodipine, valsartan, and hydrochloro
skip to content
Dovepress - Open Access to Scientific and Medical Research
View our mobile site

14844

Triple combination therapy with amlodipine, valsartan, and hydrochlorothiazide vs dual combination therapy with amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide for stage 2 hypertensive patients



Original Research

(8484) Total Article Views


Authors: Maurizio Destro, Nora Crikelair, Joseph Yen, et al.

Published Date September 2010 Volume 2010:6 Pages 821 - 827
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S11522

Maurizio Destro1, Nora Crikelair2, Joseph Yen2, Robert Glazer
 
1Azienda Ospedaliera della Provincia di Pavia, Stradella (PV), Italy; 2Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA

Objective: This post hoc analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of triple therapy with amlodipine/valsartan+hydrochlorothiazide (Aml/Val+HCTZ) vs dual therapy with Aml+HCTZ in stage 2 hypertensive patients.

Methods: The analysis included patients from an eight-week, multicenter, double-blind study, randomized to Aml/Val 10/160 mg or Aml 10 mg groups, who received add-on HCTZ 12.5 mg at week 4 if mean sitting systolic blood pressure (msSBP) was >130 mmHg.

Results: Of the patients receiving Aml/Val+HCTZ and Aml+HCTZ, 98% (N = 133/136) and 96% (N = 200/208) completed the study, respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar across groups (Caucasians, 80.2%; diabetics, 14.8%; age, 58.6 years [28.2% ≥ 65 years]; body mass index, 31 kg/m2; mean sitting blood pressure (msBP), 171.5/95.5 mmHg [18% msSBP ≥ 180 mmHg]). Aml/Val+HCTZ provided significantly greater msBP reductions from baseline to week 8 than Aml+HCTZ (30.5/13.8 vs 24.3/8.3 mmHg, P < 0.0001). The incremental msBP reduction (week 4 to 8) with HCTZ added to Aml/Val was greater than when added to Aml (6.9/3.5 vs 3.1/1.0 mmHg, P < 0.01). Treatments were well tolerated with similar overall incidence of adverse events (Aml/Val+HCTZ: 33.8%, Aml+HCTZ: 33.2%).

Conclusion: Aml/Val+HCTZ provided significantly greater BP reductions than Aml+HCTZ in patients with stage 2 hypertension. Aml/Val+HCTZ triple therapy may be a suitable option for patients requiring more than two agents to reach target BP.

Keywords: amlodipine, valsartan, stage 2 hypertension, HCTZ, triple therapy


Post to:
Cannotea Citeulike Del.icio.us Facebook LinkedIn Twitter

 

Other articles by Dr Maurizio Destro


Readers of this article also read:
  • ACC 2014

    We will attend the 2014 American College of Cardiology Scientific Session and Expo (ACC) on March 29-31, 2014. Stop by booth 3217 to talk with us.

  • Like us on Facebook

    Click the blue link above to become a part of our Facebook community.