It is the cache of ${baseHref}. It is a snapshot of the page. The current page could have changed in the meantime.
Tip: To quickly find your search term on this page, press Ctrl+F or ⌘-F (Mac) and use the find bar.

Comparison of rangeland vegetation study methods | Çakal | International Journal of Forest, Soil and Erosion (IJFSE)

Comparison of rangeland vegetation study methods

Ş. Çakal, A. Kara Kara, A. Koç, A. Avağ

Abstract


This study was conducted in the natural rangeland of the Ataturk University, Erzurum, Türkiye. The aim of the study was to determine the differences appearing in the use of different vegetation measurement methods (i.e. loop, transect, wheel point (WP) and modified wheel point (MWP). It was also aimed to determine the optimum number of sample for each method, and to improve the arrangements to compare the data from different methods on the same vegetation. The data were collected from 60 lines. Regression formulas were generated regarding canopy coverage ratios. In all methods, it was observed that grass family made up of an important part of the whole vegetation while the Festuca ovina was dominant specie. Other families and legumes followed in diminishing order. The difference between the methods was found to be statistically significant (p

References


Bakır, Ö., 1970a. Comparison of Some Important Methods Used for Vegetation Studies, Faculty of Agriculture Yearbook, 19:550-579, Ankara, Ankara University.

Bakır, Ö., 1970b. A Vegetation Study on the Grasslands of Middle East Technical University, Faculty of Agriculture Publications No: 382, Scientific Research Publications No:232, No: 232, Ankara, Ankara University

Canfield, R. H., 1941. Application of the line interception method in sampling range vegetation. J. Forest. 39 (4), 388-394.

De Vries, D. M., De Boer, TH. A., and Diver, J.P.P., 1951. Evaluation of grassland by botanical research in the Netherlands. Proceedings of the United Nationals Scientific Conference on the Conservation and Utilization of Resources, 6, 522-524.

Fisser, H. G. and Van Dyne, G.M., 1966. Influence of number and spacing of points on accuracy and precision of basal cover estimates. J. Range Manage., 19, 205-211.

Gökkuş, A., Koç, A., and Çomaklı, B., 2000. Pasture and Meadow Application Guide, Faculty of Agriculture Publications No: 142, Erzurum, Atatürk University.

Greig-Smith, P., 1983 Quantitative Plant Ecology (3rd edition) Blackwell Scientific Publications, 359 p, London.

Griffin, G.F., 1989. An enhanced Wheel-Point Method for assessing cover, structure and heterogeneity in plant communities. J. Range Manage., 42,79-81.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Unit 15, Third floor (East), Hafezi Commercial and official Building, across from Tose'e Ta'avon Bank, Emam St. (west), Shabestar City, East Azerbaijan Province, Iran Postal code: 5381917951 _____ آذربایجان شرقی- شبستر- خیابان امام (غربی)- روبروی بانک توسعه و تعاون- ساختمان ادارای و تجاری حافظی- طبقه سوم شرقی- واحد 15- کد پستی 5381917951