It is the cache of ${baseHref}. It is a snapshot of the page. The current page could have changed in the meantime.
Tip: To quickly find your search term on this page, press Ctrl+F or ⌘-F (Mac) and use the find bar.

Local Flexibility within an Accountability System | Scafidi | education policy analysis archives

Local Flexibility within an Accountability System

Benjamin Scafidi, Catherine Freeman, Stan DeJarnett

Abstract


Over the past decade, several states have created comprehensive accountability systems designed to increase student learning in public schools. These accountability systems are based on "high-stakes" standardized testing of a state curriculum. Rewards and interventions for local educators are based largely upon students' performance on these tests. Using the recent accountability reforms in Georgia as a backdrop, this article considers the role of local flexibility within such an accountability system--flexibility over paperwork, resources, personnel, and curriculum for local educators. Increased flexibility for local educators is not merely an option in a world where local educators are subject to a comprehensive accountability system imposed by a state--it is a requirement for success. We make a case for providing local flexibility and provides a discussion regarding types of flexibility, vehicles for granting flexibility, and who should receive flexibility.

Keywords


Student Learning; Accountability; High Stakes Testing; Curriculum; rewards; Interventions; Performance; Flexibility

Full Text:

PDF


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v9n44.2001

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
 

This article has been viewed: 11674 times since October 25, 2001





Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.



school logo ASU Teachers College logo Open Access Contact EPAA//AAPE at Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College

 

 

this site is powered by Open Journal Systems and Wordpress