Local Flexibility within an Accountability System
Benjamin Scafidi, Catherine Freeman, Stan DeJarnett
Abstract
Over the past decade, several states have created comprehensive accountability systems designed to increase student learning in public schools. These accountability systems are based on "high-stakes" standardized testing of a state curriculum. Rewards and interventions for local educators are based largely upon students' performance on these tests. Using the recent accountability reforms in Georgia as a backdrop, this article considers the role of local flexibility within such an accountability system--flexibility over paperwork, resources, personnel, and curriculum for local educators. Increased flexibility for local educators is not merely an option in a world where local educators are subject to a comprehensive accountability system imposed by a state--it is a requirement for success. We make a case for providing local flexibility and provides a discussion regarding types of flexibility, vehicles for granting flexibility, and who should receive flexibility.
Keywords
Student Learning; Accountability; High Stakes Testing; Curriculum; rewards; Interventions; Performance; Flexibility
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v9n44.2001 Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This article has been viewed: 11674 times since October 25, 2001
This
work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.