It is the cache of
${baseHref}.
It is a snapshot of the page. The
current page
could have changed in the meantime.
Tip: To quickly find your search term on this page, press
Ctrl+F or
⌘-F (Mac) and use the find bar.
The mandatory use of English in the federal court of Puerto Rico
Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina y el Caribe, España y Portugal Scientific Information System
Although most District Court personnel and jurors in Puerto Rico are native Spanish speakers, they are legally required to be competent in English because the proceedings are in English. The language requirement is implemented through special tests for attorneys and a jury selection process that disqualifies non-Englishproficient candidates. The policy has clear constitutional implications since it restricts jury participation to a generally upper-class minority and calls into question the guarantee of a jury of ones own peers. Efforts to change the practice have been ongoing but unsuccessful. This paper traces the history of the issue and argues that switching to Spanish as the court language would be congruent with prevailing notions of human rights and language planning.
Resumo em Português
-No disponible-
Kurzfassung auf Deutsch
-No disponible-
Résumé en français
-No disponible-
Abstract in italiano
-No disponible-
Todos los idiomas
Resumen
Inglés
Although most District Court personnel and jurors in Puerto Rico are native Spanish speakers, they are legally required to be competent in English because the proceedings are in English. The language requirement is implemented through special tests for attorneys and a jury selection process that disqualifies non-Englishproficient candidates. The policy has clear constitutional implications since it restricts jury participation to a generally upper-class minority and calls into question the guarantee of a jury of ones own peers. Efforts to change the practice have been ongoing but unsuccessful. This paper traces the history of the issue and argues that switching to Spanish as the court language would be congruent with prevailing notions of human rights and language planning.