14853
-
International Journal of General Medicine
- About Dovepress
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals.
- Open Access
Dove Medical Press is now a member of the Open Access Initiative
- An Author's Guide
A guide to help authors get their paper published.
- Advocacy
Support Open Access and Dove Press
- Reprints
Promotional Article Monitoring - further details
- Favored Author Program
Real benefits for authors, including fast-track processing of papers.
General practitioners' experiences, attitudes, and opinions regarding the pneumococcal vaccination for adults: a qualitative study
Original Research
(2535) Total Article Views
Authors: Badertscher N, Morell S, Rosemann T, Tandjung R
Published Date November 2012 Volume 2012:5 Pages 967 - 974
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S38472
| Received: | 24 September 2012  |
|---|---|
| Accepted: | 23 October 2012 |
| Published: | 20 November 2012 |
Institute of General Practice and Health Services Research, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Introduction: Diseases caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae generate substantial morbidity and mortality. Despite official recommendations to vaccinate everyone over the age of 64, the estimated vaccination rate for this target population is around 2%. In Switzerland, pneumococcal vaccinations are for the most part provided by general practitioners (GPs); in addition, a small number of patients get vaccinated during a hospital stay. We wanted to investigate GPs' attitudes and opinions about the pneumococcal vaccination in primary care and why it is so rarely provided.
Methods: For this qualitative study, we conducted semistructured interviews with 20 GPs. Transcriptions of all interviews were analyzed following the technique of qualitative content analysis, supported by the ATLAS.ti© software.
Results: Most GPs reported that they know pneumococcal vaccination is recommended for several risk groups and elderly patients. As to reasons for the low vaccination rate, GPs mentioned the pneumococcal vaccination had little priority in daily practice, especially in comparison with the importance of other vaccinations, namely influenza. This low level of priority was supported by the fact that the GPs rarely ever experienced a case of a severe pneumococcal disease in their daily work. Furthermore, perceived insufficient evidence resulting from existing epidemiologic data and clinical trials enhanced the little attention given to the pneumococcal vaccination.
Conclusion: We found the generally low level of priority given within a consultation, the missing awareness of this subject in daily practice, and the perception of epidemiologic and scientific data as insufficient, as the reasons for the low rate in pneumococcal vaccinations. Efforts to increase the epidemiologic data on the pneumococcal vaccination should be taken. To increase the vaccination rate, it would be necessary to raise the awareness and priority of the pneumococcal vaccination; a feasible way could be the combination of the seasonal flu vaccination campaign with a campaign for pneumococcal vaccination.
Keywords: prevention, Swiss primary care, barriers and facilitators, Streptococcus pneumoniae
Post to:
Cannotea Citeulike Del.icio.us Facebook LinkedIn Twitter
Other articles by Dr Ryan Tandjung
Readers of this article also read:
- Testimonials
"I was impressed at the rapidity of publication from submission to final acceptance." Dr Edwin Thrower, PhD, Yale University.
- Diagnosis of depression by MRI scans with the use of VSRAD – a promising auxiliary means of diagnosis: a report of 10 years research
- Effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors on motor neuron survival
- Review of evidence for immune evasion and persistent infection in Lyme disease
- Amino acid management of Parkinson’s disease: a case study
