It is the cache of ${baseHref}. It is a snapshot of the page. The current page could have changed in the meantime.
Tip: To quickly find your search term on this page, press Ctrl+F or ⌘-F (Mac) and use the find bar.

Differential item functioning of the UWES-17 in South Africa | Goliath-Yarde | SA Journal of Industrial Psychology
  Search this journal:     Advanced search
Original Research

Differential item functioning of the UWES-17 in South Africa

Leanne Goliath-Yarde, Gert Roodt

SA Journal of Industrial Psychology; Vol 37, No 1 (2011), 11 pages. doi: 10.4102/sajip.v37i1.897

Submitted: 26 February 2010
Published:  15 November 2011

Abstract

Orientation: South Africa’s unique cultural diversity provides a constant challenge about the fair and unbiased use of psychological measures in respect of their cross-cultural application.

Research purpose: This study assesses the Differential Item Functioning (DIF) of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-17) for different South African cultural groups in a South African company.

Motivation for the study: Organisations are using the UWES-17 more and more in South Africa to assess work engagement. Therefore, research evidence from psychologists or assessment practitioners on its DIF across different cultural groups is necessary.

Research design, approach and method: The researchers conducted a Secondary Data Analysis (SDA) on the UWES-17 sample (n = 2429) that they obtained from a cross-sectional survey undertaken in a South African Information and Communication Technology (ICT) sector company (n = 24 134). Quantitative item data on the UWES-17 scale enabled the authors to address the research question.

Main findings: The researchers found uniform and/or non-uniform DIF on five of the vigour items, four of the dedication items and two of the absorption items. This also showed possible Differential Test Functioning (DTF) on the vigour and dedication dimensions.

Practical/managerial implications: Based on the DIF, the researchers suggested that organisations should not use the UWES-17 comparatively for different cultural groups or employment decisions in South Africa.

Contribution/value add: The study provides evidence on DIF and possible DTF for the UWES-17. However, it also raises questions about possible interaction effects that need further investigation.


Full Text:  |  HTML  |  EPUB  |  XML  |  PDF (1MB)

Author affiliations

Leanne Goliath-Yarde, University of Johannesburg, South Africa
Gert Roodt, University of Johannesburg, South Africa

Metrics

Total abstract views: 475
Total article views: 1871  

Cited-By

1. Dimensionality of the UWES-17: An item response modelling analysis
Deon P. De Bruin, Carin Hill, Carolina M. Henn, Klaus-Peter Muller
SA Journal of Industrial Psychology  vol: 39  issue: 2  year: 2013  
doi: 10.4102/sajip.v39i2.1148

Comments on this article

Before posting your comment, please read our policy.
Post a Comment (Login required)


ISSN: 0258-5200 (print) | ISSN: 2071-0768 (online) Follow us on:

All articles published in this journal are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.

©2014 AOSIS (Pty) Ltd. All Rights Reserved. No Unauthorised Duplication Allowed.

AOSIS OpenJournals | Perfecting Scholarship Online
Postnet Suite #110, Private Bag X19, Durbanville, South Africa, 7551
Tel: 086 1000 381
Tel: +27 21 975 2602
Fax: 086 5004 974

Please read the privacy statement.