It is the cache of ${baseHref}. It is a snapshot of the page. The current page could have changed in the meantime.
Tip: To quickly find your search term on this page, press Ctrl+F or ⌘-F (Mac) and use the find bar.

Analyzing the Unreliable Narrator: Repetition and Subjectivity in Raymond Carver's "What Do You Do in San Francisco?" | Al-Mansoob | Theory and Practice in Language Studies
Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol 1, No 7 (2011), 802-810, Jul 2011
doi:10.4304/tpls.1.7.802-810

Analyzing the Unreliable Narrator: Repetition and Subjectivity in Raymond Carver's "What Do You Do in San Francisco?"

Huda Al-Mansoob

Abstract


The focus of this paper is on a further investigation into the growing area of research in the idea of unreliability in literary studies. The paper seeks to examine the issue of unreliability with reference to Raymond Carver's seminal short story "What Do You Do in San Francisco?" The first part of the paper provides an overview of the contrasted key theoretical investigations into the concept of unreliability, and in the second part, I have made an analysis of Carver's story by applying the ideas of unreliability, mainly A. Nünning's cognitive model. Even with the publication of Booth's (1961, [1983]), narrative element assumes the central significance in narratology. In recent times, many theorists have taken issue with Booth and have even denounced some of the fundamental ideas propounded by Booth. Taking into cognizance both sides of the arguments, my paper, besides discussing the notion of unreliability, attempts a detailed analysis of Carver's narrative. In essence, the paper highlights how the foregrounded language of the surface of the story contributes to the reader's suspicion of the reliability of the narrator, thus forcing him/her to scrutinize its depth in an attempt to fathom an ample meaning.


Keywords


unreliability; cognitive analysis; stylistics; Raymond Carver; narratology

References


Al-Mansoob, H. (2004). "What Do You Do in San Francisco?" text worlds in Raymond Carver. Unpublished paper presented at the annual convention of PALA, New York, July.

Al-Mansoob, H. (2010a). From her perspective: language, style and cognition in the foregrounded present-tense narrative of Raymond Carver‟s "Fat". Journal of Language and Literature 3, 85-92.

Al-Mansoob, H. (in press). The present tense in the text world of Truman Capote's "A Christmas Memory": a cognitive perspective. Journal of Ibb University Researcher.

Banfield, A. (1982). Unspeakable sentences: narration and representation in the language of fiction. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Booth, W. (1961). The rhetoric fiction. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Booth, W. (1974). A rhetoric of irony. Chicago: Chicago Univ. Press.

Booth, W. (1983). The rhetoric fiction. 2nd ed. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Campbell, E. (1992). Raymond Carver: a study of the short fiction. New York: Twayne.

Carver, Raymond. (1993). "What Do You Do in San Francisco?" Will You Please Be Quiet, Please? Raymond Carver. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Chatman, S. (1978). Story and discourse: narrative Structure in fiction and Film. Ithaca, NY, and London: Cornell University Press.

Chatman, S. (1990). Coming to terms: the rhetoric of narrative in fiction and film. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Chenetier, M. (1986). Living on/off the 'Reserve'. In M. Chenetier (ed.), Critical Angles: European views of contemporary American literature. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 165-90.

Cohn, D. (2000). Discordant narration. Style 34.2, 307–16.

Cornwell, G. (2005). Mediated desire and American disappointment in the stories of Raymond Carver. Critique 46.4, 344-56.

Culler, J. (1975). Structuralist poetics: structuralism, linguistics and the study of literature. London: Routledge.
doi:10.4324/9780203449769

D'hoker, E. (2007). The unreliable Ripley: irony and satire in Robert Mcliam Wilson's Ripley Bogle. Modern Fiction Studies 52. 3, 460-477.

D'hoker, E. and Gunther M. (eds.) (2008). Narrative unreliability in the twentieth-century first-person novel. (Narratologia, 14). Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.

Emmott, C. (2002). Responding to style: cohesion, foregrounding and thematic interpretation. In W. van Peer (ed.), Thematics: interdisciplinary studies. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 91-117.

Facknitz, M. (1992). Raymond Carver and the menace of minimalism. In C. Ewing (ed.), Raymond Carver: a study of the Short Fiction. New York: Twayne.

Fludernik, M. (1996). Towards a 'natural' narratology. London: Routledge.

Gentry, M. and Stull, W. (1990). Conversations with Raymond Carver. Jackson: UP of Mississippi.

Hansen, P. K. (2007). Reconsidering the unreliable narrator. Semiotica 165.1/4, 227–246.
doi:10.1515/SEM.2007.041

Henning, B. (1989). Minimalism and the American dream: 'Shiloh' by Bobbie Ann Mason and "Preservation" by Raymond Carver. Modern Fiction Studies 35.4, 689-98.

Herzinger, K. (1985). Introduction: on the new fiction. Mississippi Review 40-41, 7-22.

Johnstone, B. et al. (1994). Repetition in discourse: a dialogue. In B. Jonhstone (ed.), Repetition in discourse: interdisciplinary perspectives (Vol.1). Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1-20.

Kindt, T. and Müller, H.H. (2006). The implied author: concept and controversy. (Narratologia: contributions to narrative theory, 9). Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.

Labov, W. (1972). The transformation of experience in narrative syntax. In W. Labov (ed.), Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 354-96.

Lanser, S. (2001). (Im)plying the author. Narrative 9, 153–60.

Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics (Vols. 1&2) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1977.

Meyer, A. (1999). Now you see him, now you don‟t, now you again: the evolution of Raymond Carver‟s minimalism. Critique 30, 239-51.

Miall D. and Kuiken, D. (1994a). Foregrounding, defamiliarization, and affect: response to literary stories. Poetics 22, 337-407.
doi:10.1016/0304-422X(94)00011-5

Nesset, K. (1995). The stories of Raymond Carver: a critical study. Athens: Ohio University press.

Nünning, A. (1993). Renaissance eines anthropomorphisierten Passepartouts oder Nachruf auf ein literaturkritisches Phantom? Überlegungen und Alternativen zum Konzept des 'implied author.'"Deutsche Vierteljahresschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte 67, 1–25. Nünning, A. (1998). Unreliable Narration zur Einführung: Grundzüge einer kognitiv-narratologischen Theorie und Analyze unglaubwürdigen Erzählens." Unreliable Narration: Studien zur Theorie und Praxis unglaubwürdigen Erzählens in der englischsprachigen Erzählliteratur. Ed. Ansgar Nünning. Trier: WVT, 3–40.

Nünning, A. (2008). Reconceptualizing the theory, history and generic scope of unreliable narration: towards a synthesis of cognitive and rhetorical approaches. In E. D'hoker and M. Gunther (eds.), Narrative Unreliability in the Twentieth-Century First-Person Novel,(Narratologia, 14). Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, 29–76.
doi:10.1515/9783110209389.29

Nünning, V. (2004). Unreliable narration and the historical variability of values and norms: the Vicar of Wakefield as a test case of a cultural-historical narratology. Style 38. 2, 236-252.

Olson, G. (2003). Reconsidering unreliability: fallible and untrustworthy narrators. Narrative 11.1, 93-109.
doi:10.1353/nar.2003.0001

Rimmon-K., Sh. (1983). Narrative fiction: contemporary poetics. London: Routledge.
doi:10.4324/9780203426111

Runyon, P. R. (1992). Reading Raymond Carver. New York: Syracuse University Press.

Saltzman, A. (1988). Understanding Raymond Carver. Columbia: University of South, Carolina Press.

Scofield, M. (1999). Story and history in Raymond Carver. Critique 40.3, 266-251.

Short, M. (1996). Exploring the language of poems, plays and prose. London: Longman.

Tannen, D. (1987a). Repetition in conversation as spontaneous formulaicity. Text 7, 215-43.
doi:10.1515/text.1.1987.7.3.215

Toolan, M. (1995). Discourse style makes viewpoint: the examples of Carver‟s narrator in "Cathedral." In P. Verdonk and J. J. Weber (eds.), Twentieth Century Fiction: From Text to Context. London: Routledge.

Wall, Kathleen. (1994). The remains of the day and its challenges to theories of unreliable narration. Journal of Narrative Technique 24, 18–24.

Wolfson, N. (1978). A feature of performed narrative: the conversational historical present. Language in Society 5, 215-37.
doi:10.1017/S0047404500005534

Wolfson, N. (1979). Conversational historical present alternation. Language 55, 168-82.
doi:10.2307/412521

Yacobi, T. (1981). Fictional reliability as a communicative problem. Poetics Today 2, 113-126.
doi:10.2307/1772193

Zerweck, B. (2001). Historicizing unreliable narration: unreliability and cultural discourse in narrative fiction. Style 35.1, 151-178.


Full Text: PDF


Theory and Practice in Language Studies (TPLS, ISSN 1799-2591)

Copyright @ 2006-2014 by ACADEMY PUBLISHER – All rights reserved.