It is the cache of ${baseHref}. It is a snapshot of the page. The current page could have changed in the meantime.
Tip: To quickly find your search term on this page, press Ctrl+F or ⌘-F (Mac) and use the find bar.

Changing from bevacizumab to ranibizumab in age-related macular degene
skip to content
Dovepress - Open Access to Scientific and Medical Research
View our mobile site

14789

Changing from bevacizumab to ranibizumab in age-related macular degeneration. Is it safe?



Original Research

(6298) Total Article Views


Authors: Dimitrios A Karagiannis, Ioannis D Ladas, Efstratios Parikakis, et al.

Published Date November 2009 Volume 2009:4 Pages 457 - 461
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S8367

Dimitrios A Karagiannis1, Ioannis D Ladas2, Efstratios Parikakis1, Ilias Georgalas2, Athanasios Kotsolis2, Giorgos Amariotakis1, Vasileios Soumplis1, Panagiotis Mitropoulos1

1Ophthalmiatrio Eye Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece; 2First Department of Ophthalmology, Medical School of Athens University, General Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece

Objective: To report our experiences in changing from intravitreal bevacizumab to ranibizumab in age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

Design: Retrospective case series.

Participants and methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 34 patients (36 eyes) who were treated with monthly injections of intravitreal bevacizumab for six months and then switched to monthly injections of ranibizumab for 12 months. Best-corrected visual acuity measurements (BCVA), contact lens biomicroscopy, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and fluorescein angiography were performed at the baseline examination and then monthly. Chi-square test was used for statistical analysis.

Results: Following bevacizumab treatment, retinal thickness decreased (P = 0.033) while BCVA improved (P = 0.040). Changing from bevacizumab to ranibizumab resulted in a transient decrease in BCVA (P = 0.045) and an increase in retinal thickness (P = 0.042). In addition, three eyes presented with a large subretinal hemorrhage. However, final retinal thickness was better than the initial thickness and the value following the bevacizumab course. No major ocular or systemic side effects were noted.

Conclusions: Ranibizumab was clinically effective in the long term but the change of treatment from bevacizumab to a half-size molecule with less half-life in the vitreous such as ranibizumab contributed to a transient “instability” in the eye which may have triggered the large subretinal hemorrhage. There is insufficient experience reported in the literature in switching from one agent to another. A prospective study with controls is necessary to determine whether it is safe to change from one medication to another.

Keywords: age-related macular degeneration, bevacizumab, ranibizumab, subretinal hemorrhage




Post to:
Cannotea Citeulike Del.icio.us Facebook LinkedIn Twitter

 

Other articles by Dr Dimitrios Karagiannis


Readers of this article also read: