It is the cache of ${baseHref}. It is a snapshot of the page. The current page could have changed in the meantime.
Tip: To quickly find your search term on this page, press Ctrl+F or ⌘-F (Mac) and use the find bar.

Validity of the recorded International Classification of Diseases, 10t
skip to content
Dovepress - Open Access to Scientific and Medical Research
View our mobile site

14789

Validity of the recorded International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition diagnoses codes of bone metastases and skeletal-related events in breast and prostate cancer patients in the Danish National Registry of Patients



Original Research

(5528) Total Article Views


Authors: Annette Østergaard Jensen, Mette Nørgaard, Mellissa Yong, et al.

Published Date July 2009 Volume 2009:1 Pages 101 - 108
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S5446

Annette Østergaard Jensen1, Mette Nørgaard1, Mellissa Yong2, Jon P Fryzek2, Henrik Toft Sørensen1

1Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University hospital, Århus, Denmark; 2Global Epidemiology, Amgen inc., Thousands Oaks, CA, USA

Objective: The clinical history of bone metastases and skeletal-related events (SREs) secondary to cancers is not well understood. In support of studies of the natural history of bone metastases and SREs in Danish prostate and breast cancer patients, we estimated the sensitivity and specificity of hospital diagnoses for bone metastases and SREs (ie, radiation therapy to the bone, pathological or osteoporotic fractures, spinal cord compression and surgery to the bone) in a nationwide medical registry in Denmark.

Study design and setting: In North Jutland County, Denmark, we randomly sampled 100 patients with primary prostate cancer and 100 patients with primary breast cancer diagnoses from the National Registry of Patients (NRP), during the period January 1st, 2000 to December 31st, 2000 and followed them for up to five years after their cancer diagnosis. We used information from medical chart reviews as the reference for estimating sensitivity, and specificity of the NRP International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition (ICD-10) coding for bone metastases and SRE diagnoses.

Results: For prostate cancer, the overall sensitivity of bone metastases or SRE coding in the NRP was 0.54 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.39–0.69), and the specificity was 0.96 (95% CI: 0.87–1.00). For breast cancer, the overall sensitivity of bone metastases or SRE coding in the NRP was 0.58 (95% CI: 0.34–0.80), and the specificity was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.88–0.99).

Conclusion: We measured the validity of ICD-10 coding in the Danish NRP for bone metastases and SREs in prostate and breast cancer patients and found it has adequate sensitivity and high specificity. The NRP remains a valuable tool for clinical epidemiological studies of bone metastases and SREs.

Keywords: bone metastases, skeletal-related events (SRE), sensitivity, specificity

General overview: We estimated the sensitivity and specificity of the International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition (ICD-10) coding for bone metastases and skeletal-related events (SRE) (ie, radiation therapy to the bone, pathological or osteoporotic fractures, spinal cord compression, and surgery to the bone) in a nationwide medical registry in Denmark. In North Jutland County, Denmark, we randomly sampled 100 patients with primary prostate cancer and 100 patients with primary breast cancer diagnoses from the National Registry of Patients (NRP) during the period January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2000 and followed them for up to five years after their cancer diagnosis. We used information from medical chart reviews as the reference. For prostate cancer, the sensitivity of bone metastases or SRE coding in the NRP was 0.54 (95% CI: 0.39-0.69), and the specificity was 0.96 (95% CI: 0.87-1.00). For breast cancer, the sensitivity of bone metastases or SRE coding in the NRP was 0.58 (95% CI: 0.34-0.80), and the specificity was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.88-0.99.




Post to:
Cannotea Citeulike Del.icio.us Facebook LinkedIn Twitter

 

Other articles by Dr Annette Ostergaard Jensen


Readers of this article also read: