It is the cache of ${baseHref}. It is a snapshot of the page. The current page could have changed in the meantime.
Tip: To quickly find your search term on this page, press Ctrl+F or ⌘-F (Mac) and use the find bar.

Cutaneous ameobiasis masquerading as epithelioma Chandrasekhar H R, Shashikala P, Kumar P, Bas - Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol
 IADVL
Indexed with PubMed and Science Citation Index (E) 
 
Users online: 374 
     Home | Feedback | Login 
About Current Issue Archive Ahead of print Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe What's New Contact  
  Navigate here 
  Search
 
   Next article
   Previous article 
   Table of Contents
  
 Resource links
   Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
  Related articles
   [PDF Not available] *
   Citation Manager
   Access Statistics
   Reader Comments
   Email Alert *
   Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   Abstract
   Introduction
   Case Report
   Comments
   References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed 4104    
    Printed 45    
    Emailed 1    
    PDF Downloaded 0    
    Comments  [Add]    
    Cited by others  1    

Recommend this journal

 


 
CASE REPORT
Year : 1993  |  Volume : 59  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 254-255

Cutaneous ameobiasis masquerading as epithelioma


,

Correspondence Address:
H R Chandrasekhar


Login to access the Email id


Get Permissions

  Abstract  

A case of cutaneous amoebiasis, clinically diagnosed as epithelioma, presenting as an ulcer in the perianal region, in a 30-year old male is reported. The patient was successfully treated with metronidazole.


Keywords: Amoebiasis


How to cite this article:
Chandrasekhar H R, Shashikala P, Kumar P, Bas. Cutaneous ameobiasis masquerading as epithelioma. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1993;59:254-5

How to cite this URL:
Chandrasekhar H R, Shashikala P, Kumar P, Bas. Cutaneous ameobiasis masquerading as epithelioma. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol [serial online] 1993 [cited 2014 Mar 5];59:254-5. Available from: http://www.ijdvl.com/text.asp?1993/59/5/254/3947



  Introduction   Top


Amoebiasis has a worldwide distribution but it is very much common throughout the tropics including India. The magnitude of the problem depends on the incidence in the community and feeding habits.

Amoebic ulcers are more common in caecum and rectum. Complications either result from migration of amoebae through bowel wall or following invasion of veins. Entamoeba histolytica can spread from bowel to other organs producing extraintestinal or metastatic amoebiasis. Organs usually affected are lungs and liver, cutaneous amoebiasis being uncommon.


  Case Report   Top


A 30-year-old agriculturist was admitted with the sole complaint of a painful ulcer around the anus, of 8 months duration. His general physical and systemic examinations were unremarkable, except for bilateral, small nontender inguinal lymphadenopathy. Local examination revealed tender perianal ulcer, 3 cms in diameter, with raised, everted margins and necrotic debris in the floor. Routine laboratory investigations, chest X-ray and abdominal scan were normal. Stool examination was negative for ova and cyst. With a diagnosis of epithelioma, with secondaries in the inguinal lymph nodes, the ulcer was excised.

Light microscopy showed epidermis with acanthosis and pseudo - epitheliomatous hyperplasia, with focal superficial ulcer containing necrotic debris, plenty of large round amoebae with a single round basophilic nucleus, foamy cytoplasm and erythrophagocytosis. Dermis showed proliferated capillaries, dense infiltration of plasma cells, lymphocytes, eosinophils and few foreign-body type of giant cells. Iron haematoxylin stain highlighted amoebae. Patient responded to metronidazole.


  Comments   Top


Cutaneous amoebiasis is rare with isolated case reports. [1],[2][3] Cutaneous amoebiasis occurs in four distinct situations: from perforation of an abscess or intestine into skin; from surgical wounds infected secondarily with an intestinal amoebic lesion; as a primary focus in the ocular orbit, the face and other sites, and finally in the perineal genital area [4],[5]

There was no history of diarrhea and stool examination was negative for amoebae in our case. Patient possibly was a carrier and ulcer was due to direct extension from rectum or fecal contamination. Inguinal lymphadenopathy was considered nonspecific since the patient worked in fields and walked bare foot.

It is important to remember that history of diarrhea is not essential in making a diagnosis of cutaneous amoebiasis. Presence of Entamoeba histolytica in the stool is not necessarily accompanied by clinical amoebiasis. Multiple fresh stools may need to be examined by experienced laboratory personnel. Because stool examination is difficult, and can lead to both under and over diagnosis, serodiagnosis has become useful. A definite diagnosis depends on recognition of Entamoeba histolytica in the lesions. With prompt diagnosis and appropriate therapy, lesions heal rapidly. If untreated, the disease may be fatal particularly in infants.

 
  References   Top

1. Abdus Sattar AB. An unusual cutaneous amoebic ulcer. JTrop Med Hyg 1979; 82: 201-2.  Back to cited text no. 1  [PUBMED]  
2. Wynne JM. Perineal amoebiasis. Arch Dis Child 1980; 55:234-5.  Back to cited text no. 2  [PUBMED]  
3. Majmudar B, Chaiken M, Lee KV. Amoebiasis of clitoris mimicking carcinoma. JAMA 1976; 236: 1145-6.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4. Gutierrez. Diagnostic pathology of parasitic infections with clinical correlations. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger, 1990; 69-70.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5. James HG,,Waine CJ, Elso BH. Dermal Pathology, 1st Ed. New York Harper & Row, 1972: 253.  Back to cited text no. 5    



This article has been cited by
1 Amoebiasis cutis in HIV positive patient
Bumb, R., Mehta, R.
Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology. 2006; 72(3): 224-226
[Pubmed]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article

    

Online since 15th March '04
Published by Medknow