It is the cache of
${baseHref}.
It is a snapshot of the page. The
current page
could have changed in the meantime.
Tip: To quickly find your search term on this page, press
Ctrl+F or
⌘-F (Mac) and use the find bar.
Factors influencing the establishment of dominance hierar-chies of the grey triggerfish Balistes capriscus
Authors:
David W. CLEVELAND, Kari L. LAVALLI
D i v i s i o n o f N a t u r a l S c i e n c e s & M a t h e m a t i c s , B o s t o n U n i v e r s i t y , U S A
Abstract:
Unlike other balistids, grey triggerfish Balistes capriscus occur in social groups in subtropical reef assemblages and have been noted to cooperate in capturing large crustacean prey. The objective of this study were to determine the structure of dominance hierarchies of these social groups and the factors that influence hierarchies of wild-caught grey triggerfish in a naturalistic setting. From observations of four groups of triggerfish (n = 19 fish) in both dyad and group (4 – 5 fish) settings, we provide a description of triggerfish behaviors and coloration patterns and an explanation of the social context in which suites of behaviors are used by dominant, middle-ranking, and subordinate fish. Sixteen behaviors and nine coloration patterns were noted for grey triggerfish. Grey triggerfish groups form linear hierarchies in both dyads and groups as measured by Landau’s Index of Linearity (h = 1.0 for Groups 1, 3, and 4 and h = 0.95 for Group 2 in dyads; h = 1.0 for all groups in group settings). Dyadic hierarchies, however, were not necessarily good predictors of the hierarchies found in larger group settings, as they only predicted two of the four group hierarchies. Sex played no role in influencing status or behavior. Size had the greatest influence on dominance status, with larger fish being more dominant than smaller fish. An individual’s dominance ranking influenced both body coloration and posture. These results suggest that color patterns and body postures may also be used by observers as an indicator of an individual’s social status in groups [Current Zoology 56 (1): 18–35 2010].
