It is the cache of ${baseHref}. It is a snapshot of the page. The current page could have changed in the meantime.
Tip: To quickly find your search term on this page, press Ctrl+F or ⌘-F (Mac) and use the find bar.

Flexible ureteroscopy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy as primary t
skip to content
Dovepress - Open Access to Scientific and Medical Research
View our mobile site

14853

Flexible ureteroscopy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy as primary treatment for renal stones 2 cm or greater



Review

(2508) Total Article Views


Authors: Akar EC, Knudsen BE

Published Date January 2013 Volume 2013:6 Pages 1 - 10
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMI.S28852

Erin Akar, Bodo E Knudsen

Department of Urology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA

Abstract: The purpose of this review, based on the current evidence in the literature, is whether ureteroscopy (URS) is a comparable primary treatment option to the current gold standard of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for the treatment of large kidney stones 2 cm or greater. The lack of prospective randomized trials directly comparing URS and PCNL makes comparison challenging. The numerous studies are not standardized in terms of their definition of stone-free or how stone size is reported. In order to standardize comparison of results, we used a stone-free definition of <4 mm after one procedure per imaging of the author’s choice, since how each patient was imaged postoperatively was not reported. The results from the literature show that moderately large stones from 2 to 3 cm treated ureteroscopically have similar outcomes to PCNL. Stone-free rates with URS decrease when stone size is above 3 cm. Our interpretation of the literature suggests that a current limitation of URS is that multiple procedures for URS would be required to achieve comparable stone-free rates to PCNL, particularly for stones greater than 4 cm.

Keywords: ureteroscopy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, lithotripsy, urinary calculi



Post to:
Cannotea Citeulike Del.icio.us Facebook LinkedIn Twitter


Readers of this article also read:

  • Testimonials

    "I was impressed at the rapidity of publication from submission to final acceptance." Dr Edwin Thrower, PhD, Yale University.