It is the cache of http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0074-02761997000200011. It is a snapshot of the page. The current page could have changed in the meantime.
Tip: To quickly find your search term on this page, press Ctrl+F or ⌘-F (Mac) and use the find bar.

Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz - The First Instar Larva of Lutzomyia longipalpis (Diptera: Phlebotomidae)

SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.92 issue2Morphological Aspects of the Larval Instars of Chrysomya albiceps (Diptera, Calliphoridae) Reared in the LaboratoryStudy of the Weight of Eggs from Six Ixodid Species from Brazil author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz

Print version ISSN 0074-0276

Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz vol. 92 no. 2 Rio de Janeiro Mar./Apr. 1997

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0074-02761997000200011 

The First Instar Larva of Lutzomyia longipalpis (Diptera: Phlebotomidae)

Vol. 92(2): 197-203

Antônio Cesar Rios Leite+, Paul Williams

Departamento de Parasitologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Caixa Postal 486, 31270-920 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil

The morphology and chaetotaxy of the first instar larva of Lutzomyia (Lutzomyia) longipalpis are described based on observations made under scanning electron microscope. Because three-dimensional images were studied, some terminological changes are proposed to give a more realistic description of the positions of the setae. On the larval body, the pairs of setae have the following number: 9 on the head, 12 on the prothorax, 8 on the meso- and metathorax, 6 on the first to eighth abdominal segments, and 8 on the ninth abdominal segment.

Key words: Lutzomyia longipalpis - morphology - first instar - larva - chaetotaxy - scanning electron microscopy


Lutzomyia (Lutzomyia) longipalpis (Lutz and Neiva, 1912) is the type species of the genus Lutzomyia França (Diptera: Phlebotomidae). This sand fly is of medical and veterinary interest because it is the most important insect host of Leishmania chagasi Cunha and Chagas, the causative organism of American visceral leishmaniasis. L. longipalpis has proved to be amenable to laboratory colonization and some closed colonies have now been maintained for almost 20 years.

Although laboratory-reared material has been available for many years, little is known of the morphology of the immature stages of L. longipalpis. Guitton and Sherlock (1969), based on studies by optical microscopy, described the egg, fourth instar larva and pupa. Accepting the limitations of their study methods, the descriptions of Guitton and Sherlock (1969) are inadequete.

Scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used by Ward and Ready (1975) to study the chorionic sculpture of sand fly eggs, including those of L. longipalpis. SEM studies have also been the basis of a description of the pupa of L. longipalpis (Leite et al. 1991). Herein, we provide illustrations of SEM studies on the first instar larva of L. longipalpis, like that already described for the fourth instar larva (Leite & Williams 1996).


MATERIALS AND METHODS

RESULTS

DISCUSSION

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

REFERENCES


MATERIALS AND METHODS

Specimens were obtained from a closed laboratory colony that has been maintained in Belo Horizonte since 1983. The colony originated from blood fed females collected in Abaetetuba, State of Pará, Brazil, by Marisa Cenizio dos Santos in collaboration with members of the Wellcome Parasitology Unit, Belém in 1983.

Larvae were killed by dropping them in hot water (70°C). They were fixed in 70% ethyl alcohol, dehydrated in a sequence of increasing concentrations of ethyl alcohol, submitted to critical point drying in carbon dioxide, and spattered with colloidal gold (Leite & Williams 1996).

Apart from the head and the ninth abdominal segment, descriptions of setae are given in an anterior-posterior sequence, beginning from the dorsal mid-line and working circumferentially in a latero-ventral direction. The nomenclature used here is based on that of Barretto (1941) and previously adopted by Leite and Williams (1996).

 

RESULTS

The description is based on examination of 12 larvae.

General appearance of the first instar larva - The larva emerges through a dorsal, longitudinal fissure (Fig.1) and rapidly leaves the egg shell. At eclosion, it is 0.51 mm long and 0.08 mm wide (at the second thoracic segment). The integument is wrinkled, bearing minute tubercles, with or without spicules, and also with paired setae that may be simple (bare) or barbed (brush-like). Each seta arises from a tubercle. When barbed, a seta may or may not have a smooth, unbarbed stem. Each barbed setae on the dorsal surface, except those on the ninth abdominal segment, have spatulate tips. Barbed setae on the head and on the lateral and ventral surfaces of segments have pointed tips.

Head - The head bears simple (bare) setae anteriorly and barbed (brush-like) setae posteriorly (Fig. 2). Spinose hairs or finely pointed spines are implanted on dorso-, lateral- and ventro-posterior surfaces of the head (Figs 4,12). The mouthparts (Fig. 3) are of a chewing type. The labrum is wide, with spiculate ridges. Each mandible has four strong teeth in a ventral position. The maxilla is spatulate; the maxillary palp is spinose and bears papiliform processes. The mentum bears four pairs of strong teeth, and the prementum has several denticles. The labio-hypopharyngeal complex (Fig. 7) lying between the mouth and dorso-mentum, is armed with lateral and ventral premental teeth, premental cusps, and premento-lingular teeth. The labio-hypopharynx has dorsal oral fringes. The antenna (Fig. 5) has a socket and two segments; the proximal segment is short and cylindrical, whereas the distal segment is ovoid, with an apical pyriform appendage. The egg breaker (Fig. 6) has the appearance of a sharp tipped pyramid. Excluding the simple setae on the mandible (one large and two small setae) and maxilla (one large and one small setae), the numerical chaetotaxy of the head is as follows: anterior clypeal (1)!; posterior clypeal (2)!; anterior frontal (3)+; posterior frontal (4)*; dorsal vertical (5)*; lateral vertical (6)*; dorsal genal (7)!; lateral genal (8)!; ventral genal (9)!.

Prothorax - It has the appearance of two segments (Figs 11, 12). Anterior and posterior setae are separated by a transverse groove. The numerical chaetotaxy of the prothorax is as follows: intermediate anterior dorsal (1)*; external anterior dorsal (2)*; anterior lateral (3)!; external anterior ventral (4)!; intermediate anterior ventral (5)!, internal posterior dorsal (6)*; intermediate posterior dorsal (7)*, external posterior dorsal (8)*; external posterior ventral (9)*; intermediate posterior ventral (10)*; small intermediate posterior ventral (11)!; internal posterior ventral (12)*. A small, lateral tubercle below seta 8 (Fig. 13) could be a rudimentary anterior spiracle.

Meso- and metathorax - These two segments (Figs 11, 12 and 14) have the same arrangement of setae: internal dorsal (1)*; intermediate dorsal (2)*; lateral accessory (a)!; lateral (4)*; external ventral (5)*, intermediate ventral (6)*, small intermediate ventral (7)*; internal ventral (8)*. Fig. 11 shows an anomalous condition: two setae arising from the same tubercle.

First seven abdominal segments - The topography of each seta, and their name, are identical for each segment: internal dorsal (1)+; intermediate dorsal (2)*; external dorsal (3)*; dorsal accessory (a)!; lateral (4)*; ventral lateral (5)*; ventral (6)!. Ventrally, each of these abdominal segments have pseudopodia (Fig. 18) bearing small papillae.

Eighth abdominal segment - This segment has the following arrangement of setae: internal dorsal (1)*; intermediate dorsal (2)*; dorsal accessory (a)!; lateral (3)*; lateral accessory (b)!; external ventral (4)+; intermediate ventral (5)+; internal ventral (6)+. The posterior spiracle, with an apparently transverse opening, lies between setae 2 and a (Fig. 22).

Ninth abdominal segment - The last abdominal segment is quite different from these lying anteriorly (Figs 20, 21). There is a dorsal pair of prominent caudal lobes, with a single caudal seta arising from each lobe (Figs 19, 20). The following structures are visible (Fig. 23) at the base of each caudal lobe: a mammiliform button (or sensillum), a campaniform sensillum; the base of the caudal seta, and the posterior lobular seta. A caudal depression is rugose anteriorly and spiculate posteriorly. Each caudal seta is 0.70 mm long.

The anus lies between two ventral lobes. The arrangement of setae is as follows: anterior lobular caudal (1)+; caudal (2)!; posterior lobular caudal (3)+; intermediate post anal (4)!; external post anal (5)!; internal pre-anal (6)!; intermediate pre-anal (7)!; internal pre-anal (8)!.

 

DISCUSSION

The immature stages of phlebotomine sand flies are little known. This is because immatures are rarely encountered in the field and because most species are extremely difficult to rear in laboratory conditions. The available descriptions of larvae are based on light microscopy studies. Most commonly, detailed descriptions have been given only of the fourth instar larva. Descriptions of the earlier instars have been much briefer and often only record the extent to which they differ from the fourth instar.

A handicap in preparing morphological descriptions of the larvae of phlebotomines arises from a lack of uniformity in the terminology used. The nomenclature proposed most recently for the larvae of New World sand flies (Ward 1976a) was devised to describe fourth instar larvae of species belonging to the subgenera Nyssomyia and Psychodopygus (Ward 1976b). These proposals proved to be inadequate for a description of the first stage of L. longipalpIs, a member of a different subgenus. The descriptive terms used by Ward (1972) and Forattini (1973) were based on those introduced by Abonnenc (1956, 1972) to describe the larvae of Old World sand flies. All the aforementioned publications gave descriptions of fourth instar larvae, which are morphologically different from the larva of L. longipalpis. Therefore we reverted to the terminology of Barretto (1941), who included descriptions of first stage larvae of several Brazilian species of phlebotomines.

Some descriptive terms of Barretto (1941) have been modified in view of the three dimensional images obtained by SEM. Use of Barretto's terminology has an additional advantage. It was used to describe the larva of Bruchomyia argentina (Salchell 1953) and those of Nemapalpus nearcticus (Mahmond & Alexander 1992). Barretto's terminology, thus, is applicable to both subfamilies (Bruchomyiinae and Phlebotominae) that Williams (1993) included in the family Phlebotomidae.

Studies by means of SEM revealed features of a first instar larva that were either overlooked or not seen in light microscope studies. An example is a number of setae on the head. Excluding setae on the mouthparts, Barretto (1941) recorded eight pairs of setae on the first instar larvae of the Brazilian species he studied. In dealing with Old World species, Perfil'ev (1968) recorded seven pairs of setae. In the present study, nine pairs of setae were seen on the head of the first instar larva of L. longipalpis.

Perfil'ev (1968) stated that first instar larvae of Old World phlebotomines have five teeth on the mandible but only four mandibular teeth in later instars. Other studies on larvae of both Old and New World sand flies have shown that there are four mandibular teeth in all larval instars. SEM observations on the first instar larva of L. longipalpis revealed the presence of only four teeth. This confirms the light microscope observations of Barretto (1941), Hanson (1968), Guitton and Sherlock (1969), and Abonnenc (1972).

Abonnenc (1956, 1972) and Perfil'ev (1968) considered that the antennae of sand fly larvae are composed of three segments. Other authors (Barretto 1941, Hanson 1968, Forattini 1973, Ward 1976b) have suggested that antenna of larvae has only two segments. SEM observations show that the first instar larva of L. longipalpis has an antenna with two segments: a small proximal segment and a much large, ovoid, distal segment. The third (= basal) segment of Abonnenc and Perfil'ev can be better described as the antennal socket.

The integument of the head of the first instar larva of L. longipalpis is bare anterior but, posteriorly, the dorsal, lateral and ventral surfaces bear minute, finely pointed spines. Such spines have been observed in Old World phlebotomines but their arrangement may differ from that seen in L. longipalpis. Perfil'ev (1968) recorded that such spicules occur over the entire head integument of Phlebotomus perfiliewi and P. chinensis; they lie lateral to egg breaker in P. major; in P. papatasi and P. caucasicus, they are arranged in small, isolated groups; and they are anterior and lateral to the egg breaker in Sergentomyia minuta.

The arrangement of barbed setae with spatulate tips seen in L. longipalpis, has also been recorded in two African species: P. freetownensis sudanicus and S. schwetzi (Abonnenc 1956).

Perfil'ev (1968) commented that the size and arrangement of spicules on the dorsal surface of the last abdominal segment seem to be characteristic for certain species of phlebotomines. P. papatasi, for example, has few spicules; such arranged in a triangular-shaped area in P. sergenti, but in two triangular areas in P. perfiliewi. S. minuta has only a few spicules. In contrast to these Old World species, the first instar larva of L. longipalpis has a more extensive distribution of spicules on the dorsal surface of the ninth abdominal segment.

A small tubercle below seta 8 on the prothorax is considered, herein, to be a rudimentary anterior spiracle or the primordium of this structure. Mangabeira (1942a) figured the anterior spiracle of the first instar larva of Brumptomyia avellari. The certainty of the spiracle in B. avellari, examined by light microscopy, and the doubts after studies on L. longipalpis by SEM, could be an indication of morphological differences at generic level.

Differences between the larva of L. longipalpis and several first instar larvae of several Old World species have already been mentioned. The differences between the first instar larvae of three species of Brumptomyia, described by Barretto (1941), Mangabeira (1942a, e) and Hanson (1968) and that of L. longipalpis deserves further study - by SEM, if possible. Hanson (1968) briefly described the first instar of Warileya rotundipennis, but a more detailed description is required before a valid comparison can be made with the first instar larva of a species of Lutzomyia.

Within the genus Lutzomyia (which might be an invalid taxonomic concept), the first instar larva of L. longipalpis can be differentiated from all those described by Barretto (1941), Mangabeira (1942b-d) and Hanson (1968).

The foregoing discussion demonstrates that morphological features of first instar larvae can be distinctive at specific and generic levels, and can probably contribute to studies on the systematics of phlebotomines which, hitherto, have been based on the morphology of adults.

 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

To the "Centro de Microscopia Eletrônica do ICB-UFMG" for the use of a scanning electron microscope.

 

REFERENCES

  • Abonnec E 1956. L'oeuf et les formes larvaires de trois 1933, P. freetownensis magnus Sinton, 1932 et P. schwetzi phlébotomes africains: P. freetownensis sudanicus Theodor Adler, Theodor er Parrot, 1929. Arch Inst Pasteur d'Alger 34: 540-549.         [ Links ]
  • Abonnec E 1972. Les phlébotomes de la région Éthiopienne (Diptera: Psychodidae). Mem ORSTOM 55: 1-289.         [ Links ]
  • Barretto MP 1941. Morfologia dos ovos, larvas e pupas de alguns flebótomos de São Paulo. An Fac Med Univ São Paulo 17: 356-427.         [ Links ]
  • Forattini OP 1973. Entomologia médica: Psychodidae. Phlebotominae. Leishmaniases. Bartonelose. Editora Blucher Ltda., Editora da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 658 pp.         [ Links ]
  • Guitton N, Sherlock IA 1969. Descrição das fases imaturas do Phlebotomus longipalpis Lutz e Neiva, 1912 (Diptera, Psychodidae). Rev Bras Biol 29: 383-389.
  • Hanson WJ 1968. The immature stages of the subfamily Phlebotominae in Panama (Diptera: Psychodidae). Ph.D. thesis, University of Kansas, University Microfilms Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan, 104 pp. + 27 pls.         [ Links ]
  • Leite ACR, Williams P 1996. Description of the fourt instar larva of Lutzomyia longipalpis, under scanning electron microscopy. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 91: 571-578.
  • Leite ACR, Williams P, Santos MC 1991. The pupa of Lutzomyia longipalpis (Diptera: Psychodidae - Phlebotominae). Parassitologia 33: 477- 484.         [ Links ]
  • Mahmond F, Alexander JB 1992. Immature stages of Nemapalpus nearcticus (Diptera: Psychodidae). Flor Entomol 75: 171-178.         [ Links ]
  • Mangabeira O 1942a. 8ª contribuição ao estudo dos Phlebotomus (Diptera: Psychodidae) Phlebotomus (Brumptomyia) avellari Costa Lima, 1932. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 37: 225-240.
  • Mangabeira O 1942b. 9ª contribuição ao estudo dos Phlebotomus (Diptera: Psychodidae) Phlebotomus (Pressatia) triacanthus Mangabeira, 1942. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 37: 241-250.         [ Links ]
  • Mangabeira O 1942c. 10ª contribuição ao estudo dos
    Phlebotomus (Diptera: Psychodidae) Phlebotomus longispinus Mangabeira, 1842. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 37: 251-257.
  • Mangabeira O 1942d. 11ª contribuição ao estudo dos Phlebotomus (Diptera: Psychodidae) Phlebotumus oswaldoi Mangabeira, 1942. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 37: 287-295.         [ Links ]
  • Mangabeira O 1942e. 13ª contribuição ao estudo dos Phlebotomus (Diptera : Psychodidae) Phlebotomus (Brumptomyia) travassosi Mangabeira, 1942. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 37: 375-381.         [ Links ]
  • Perfil'ev PP 1968. Fauna of U.S.S.R. Diptera Phlebotominae (sandflies). Akademiya Nauk SSSR. Zoologicheskii Institut (English translation. Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem), 363 pp.         [ Links ]
  • Satchell GH 1953. On the early stages of Bruchomyia argentina Alexander (Diptera: Psychodidae). Proc R Entomol Soc Lond Ser A Gen Entomol 28: 1-12.         [ Links ]
  • Ward RD 1972. Some observations of the biology and morphology of the immature stages of Psychodopigus wellcome Fraiha, Shaw and Lainson, 1971 (Diptera: Psychodidae). Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 70: 15-28.         [ Links ]
  • Ward RD 1976a. A revised numerical chaetotaxy of neotropical phlebotomine sandfly larvae (Diptera: Psychodidae). Syst Entomol 1: 89-94.         [ Links ]
  • Ward RD 1976b. The immature stages of some phlebotominae sandflies from Brazil (Diptera: Psychodidae). Syst Entomol 1: 227-240.         [ Links ]
  • Ward RD, Ready PA 1975. Chorionic sculpturing in some sandfly eggs (Diptera: Psychodidae). J Entomol 50: 127-134.         [ Links ]
  • Williams P 1993. Relationships of phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera). Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 88: 177-183.         [ Links ]

This research was financially supported, in part, by CNPq.

+Corresponding author. Fax: +55-31-441.6909. E-mail: Rios@mono.icb.ufmg.br.

Received 17 May 1996

Accepted 27 November 1996