-
Clinical Interventions in Aging
- About Dovepress
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals.
- Open Access
Dove Medical Press is now a member of the Open Access Initiative
- An Author's Guide
A guide to help authors get their paper published.
- Advocacy
Support Open Access and Dove Press
- Reprints
Promotional Article Monitoring - further details
- Favored Author Program
Real benefits for authors, including fast-track processing of papers.
Assessment scales in stroke: clinimetric and clinical considerations
Review
(3288) Total Article Views
Authors: Harrison JK, McArthur KS, Quinn TJ
Published Date February 2013 Volume 2013:8 Pages 201 - 211
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S32405
Received: | 28 October 2012 |
---|---|
Accepted: | 04 December 2012 |
Published: | 18 February 2013 |
1Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK; 2Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
Abstract: As stroke care has developed, there has been a need to robustly assess the efficacy of interventions both at the level of the individual stroke survivor and in the context of clinical trials. To describe stroke-survivor recovery meaningfully, more sophisticated measures are required than simple dichotomous end points, such as mortality or stroke recurrence. As stroke is an exemplar disabling long-term condition, measures of function are well suited as outcome assessment. In this review, we will describe functional assessment scales in stroke, concentrating on three of the more commonly used tools: the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, the modified Rankin Scale, and the Barthel Index. We will discuss the strengths, limitations, and application of these scales and use the scales to highlight important properties that are relevant to all assessment tools. We will frame much of this discussion in the context of "clinimetric" analysis. As they are increasingly used to inform stroke-survivor assessments, we will also discuss some of the commonly used quality-of-life measures. A recurring theme when considering functional assessment is that no tool suits all situations. Clinicians and researchers should chose their assessment tool based on the question of interest and the evidence base around clinimetric properties.
Keywords: Barthel Index, clinimetrics, clinical trial, disability, methodology, modified Rankin Scale, National Institutes Health Stroke Scale, scales, stroke, outcomes
Post to:
Cannotea Citeulike Del.icio.us Facebook LinkedIn Twitter
Readers of this article also read:
- New eBook
Have a look at Dr Richard Walker's must read eBook on Amazon Kindle Why we age: Insight into the cause of growing old
- American Acne and Rosacea Society
The American Acne and Rosacea Society (AARS) is a 501(c)(6) non-profit organization dedicated to elevating the understanding and treatment of acne and rosacea.
- Have an opinion about one of our articles?
We encourage you to write a letter to the editor.
- Radio electric asymmetric brain stimulation in the treatment of behavioral and psychiatric symptoms in Alzheimer disease
- Eggshell membrane: A possible new natural therapeutic for joint and connective tissue disorders. Results from two open-label human clinical studies
- Comparison of two treatments for coxarthrosis: local hyperthermia versus radio electric asymmetrical brain stimulation
- The cognitive impact of anticholinergics: A clinical review