It is the cache of ${baseHref}. It is a snapshot of the page. The current page could have changed in the meantime.
Tip: To quickly find your search term on this page, press Ctrl+F or ⌘-F (Mac) and use the find bar.

Seroprevalence of Babesia bigeminain smallholder dairy cattle in Tanzania and associated risk factors | Swai | Journal of the South African Veterinary Association
  Search this journal:     Advanced search
Articles

Seroprevalence of Babesia bigeminain smallholder dairy cattle in Tanzania and associated risk factors

E.S. Swai, E.D. Karimuribo, N.P. French, J.L. Fitzpatrick, M.J. Bryant, D.M. Kambarage, N.H. Ogden

Journal of the South African Veterinary Association; Vol 78, No 1 (2007), 15-20. doi: 10.4102/jsava.v78i1.280

Submitted: 31 May 2007
Published:  31 May 2007

Abstract

Variations in the seroprevalence of antibody to Babesia bigemina infection by farm and animal level risk factors were investigated for 2 contrasting regions of Tanga and Iringa in Tanzania. Tanga is situated in the eastern part of the country and has typical tropical coast climate while Iringa is situated in the Southern Highlands and has a tropical highland climate. Two hundred farms from each region were selected using simple random sampling procedure and visited once between January 1999 and April 1999. Blood samples were collected from 1329 smallholder dairy animals on selected farms for harvesting serum which was subsequently used for serodiagnosis of B. bigemina using an indirect enzyme linked immuno-sorbent assay (ELISA). Of the 1329 sera samples screened, 34.9 % were positive for B. bigemina. The prevalence was higher in Iringa Region [43 %, 95% confidence intervals (CI) = 39.5-47.3] than in Tanga Region (27 %, CI = 23.6-30.5). Using a logistic binomial regression model as an analytical method for predicting the likelihood of animal seropositivity, we found (in both regions) that the risk of positive reaction varied with the animal's age, history of grazing and geographical location. Seroprevalence increased with age (b=0.01 and 0.01 per year of age, P<0.005 in Tanga and Iringa, respectively). Animals located in Lushoto and Iringa urban district were associated with increased risk of seropositivity [Odds ratio (OR)=4.24, P=0.001, for Lushoto, and OR=1.81, P=0.040, for Iringa Urban, respectively). Animals grazed 3 months prior to sampling had higher odds for seropositivity than zero/semi-grazed, despite farmer-reported high frequency of tick control (OR = 2.71, P = 0.0087, for Tanga, and OR = 4.53, P = 0.001, for Iringa). Our study suggests that even though herd sizes are small, B. bigemina infection is widespread in many smallholder dairy farms and endemic stability with respect to this disease has not yet been attained, but the observed levels are sufficiently high to ensure that clinical disease would be a risk.

Full Text:  |  PDF (287KB)

Author affiliations

E.S. Swai,
E.D. Karimuribo,
N.P. French,
J.L. Fitzpatrick,
M.J. Bryant,
D.M. Kambarage,
N.H. Ogden,

Metrics

Total abstract views: 462
Total article views: 813

Cited-By

No related citations found

Comments on this article

Before posting your comment, please read our policy.
Post a Comment (Login required)


ISSN: 1019-9128 (print) | ISSN: 2224-9435 (online) Follow us on:

All articles published in this journal are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution license.

©2014 AOSIS (Pty) Ltd. All rights reserved. No unauthorised duplication allowed.

AOSIS OpenJournals | Perfecting Scholarship Online
Postnet Suite #110, Private Bag X19, Durbanville, South Africa, 7551
Tel: 086 1000 381 
Tel: +27 21 975 2602 
Fax: 086 5004 974

Please read the privacy statement.